May 22, 2018

ste-genevieve:

thousandxarrows:

girlsfrommars:

queen-elisabitch:

queen-elisabitch:

tbh as feminists we should be more concerned by the over-normalization of hormonal birth control

for the people wondering:

first of all because hormonal birth control is a medical intervention, for a medical purpose, but I know more and more girls who view it as a rite of passage for becoming a woman who may at one point become sexually active. It’s a serious medical intervention that comes with a host of risks and side effects and is not generalizeable to every condition or need. I know more women on hormonal birth control than I do off it, and many of them are not sexually active. saying that because so many women take it it’s “normal” or “not that big a deal” is wildly underestimating the potential for complications or problems, which can include anything from persistent acne to blood clots (one of which gave my mother a pulmonary embolism and put her in the hospital).

second of all, hormonal birth control is treated as a catch-all for a host of medical problems, and it’s not. things like genuine contraception (avoiding pregnancy from PIV sex) are completely different needs from PCOS, endometriosis, severe period cramps, irregular periods, and other reproductive problems, and the reason hormonal birth control is considered a catch-all for these many different conditions is because of a lack of research and funding into women’s health and developing alternatives. We need lesser alternatives for women who take hormonal birth control for things like period cramps, because this need is completely different from PCOS or from contraception. This lack of research and funding is the same reason that hormonal birth control can also be very dangerous for some women, or have unforseen and often irreversible side effects.

third of all, birth control in general has done very little to fundamentally change women’s sexual position in society for the better. like all medical or scientific advancements, what matters is what you do with it because objectively it’s neither good nor bad it just is. but birth control in general has just served to make women more sexually accessible to men now that pregnancy is less of a concern, and this has facilitated things like hookup culture and, to a certain extent, rape culture and sex trafficking. combined with the reasons previously listed, hormonal birth control should especially be a concern.

Not to mention that condoms are only used in 10% of all porn scenes because it is assumed that the woman is on birth control… So that means STDs are spreading across porn stars. It is estimated that more than half of all porn stars have herpes, which is uncurable

Also, note how birth control has backed up the claim that pregnancy is just the woman’s responsibility and not the man’s. It’s like, conservatives say ‘’She shouldn’t have had sex if she didn’t want to become pregnant’’ and liberals say ‘’She should be on birth control if she doesn’t want to get pregnant’’… It’s been years since birth control was put on the mass market and yet there is no demand for a male equivalent of the pill?

What bothers me most about birth control is it’s a bad answer to a real problem. If women want to not get pregnant, the best way is to not do PIV, but suggesting this sparks enormous outrage. Hetbi women acting like not having PIV is equivalent of asking them to pledge to life in a nunnery. As if lesbians just don’t have sex. As if PIV isn’t frequently the most painful, boring, and anxiety inducing part of het sex. The reality is women know they will be dumped instantly when she tells a prospective male partner she won’t do PIV, and they refuse to live without male partnership. So now instead of examining why women seek out sex which is unpleasurable, dangerous, and outright terrifying for them, we can keep on happily not having to answer any hard questions, because we’ve made PIV safer for women. Sort of. Except now we have depression, suicide, permanent dental damage, blood clots to deal with instead. Yay sex positivity.

And there’s this expectation that you’re just supposed to endure the crippling side-effects until you find The One. Deal with headaches, nausea, appetite changes, irregular spotting, cramping, and more for three months to see if it regulates. If not, switch to a new formulation. Repeat process. Spend literal years of your life and hundreds or thousands of dollars trying to find the right pill so you can have PIV, when a condom is reversible and does the same thing.

Don’t like daily pills? How about implanting a foreign device in your uterus, which involves piercing your cervix to place it? Or making an incision in your arm to implant a rod that slowly releases hormones? And if you have side-effects, you can’t just stop taking it. You have to make an appointment with your doctor to have them remove it, if you can convince them you don’t want to ~*wait a few months for everything to regulate*~

I’m grateful for contraception and family planning solutions, but we are being seriously sold short.

(via destroyyourbinder)

May 22, 2018

phalloid-destroyer:

ophelias-revenge:

dont-eat-the-apple:

today i saw a photo of a woman with a tattoo on her abdomen: the skeleton of a baby, stretched across from hip to hip, reminiscent of a water color painting.

upon seeing it, i felt sorrow, as it looked like a memorial tattoo. (the photo came with no context, so i can only assume.)

the original poster accused it of being grotesque and creepy. in the comments below, someone chimed in that they wanted a tattoo of their own inspired by it, but for different reasons: as a transgender woman, their tattoo would symbolize never being able to have kids of their own.

at this, the original poster acquiesced: “oh, i guess there is one not grotesque interpretation.”

instantly, i felt furious. here were people picking apart the grief of a woman they never met, yet when a transgender woman said they wanted it, suddenly it was acceptable.

this is part of why i do not believe that transgender women will ever be able to understand the struggle of womanhood, no matter how fervently they claim to.

i see constant displays of their ignorance: the suggestion that they, too, feel ‘period pain’ and female hormonal cycles, or their insistence upon breastfeeding while swollen with artificial hormones, or the lamentation of their status as “infertile women” - as if the consequences of choosing to transition could possibly be compared to infertility through accident or unstoppable medical conditions.

it feels like watching children playing pretend, fueled by their imaginations into thinking they’re dinosaurs or pirates or fairies. but these are grown adults, believing that if they do X or do Y, that they can know what it is to be a woman as if they had been swaddled in pink from the day they were born.

what a luxury it would be, to arrive to womanhood so late in the game.

as biological women, we are haunted by our physical forms from the moment we take our first breaths: groomed to become broodmares and damned when we deviate for any reason (regardless of whether it was our choice or not), our bodies are the battleground we wage wars on, fighting desperately to protect our own autonomy.

we are not public property, though we are raised to believe the opposite. every inch of our flesh is considered an open forum where heated debate takes place; whether it’s about what we look like or what we do with ourselves, there is nowhere we can turn where people respect that our bodies are not vessels, but us, wholly and completely - and that we are the ultimate keepers of these temples.

there’s never a day that goes by that i forget that i’m female; not in the strangely fetishistic way that a man might describe me (such as my chest bouncing as i go down the stairs), but in that i am reminded of the limitations set upon me because of my sex. listing all the ways people consider being female a dead-end to anything but procreation would take too long.

even now as i write this, i have learned a new facet of my existence: if i were to memorialize the loss of my child, there would be people who might mock me for it - but only because i’m female. as it turns out, my birth sex is the difference between honorable suffering and being considered “cringey.”

yet here we are, with an entire subset of people on the outside, looking at the trauma and agony we inherit from our mothers and pass on to our daughters, looking at the cruelty strangers will levy at us even in our darkest moments, and saying: oh, i know what that’s like.

you don’t.

i respect the debilitating condition that is dysphoria, but this is not an excuse to piggyback off of the pain that we go through because of our bodies, or (god forbid) covet and envy us for it.

what’s worse? to say that you understand our lives better than we do, or to see our scars and trace your fingers across them while wishing they were yours?

it strikes me as voyeuristic and sadistic, to mourn a suffering you can never be exposed to - and it only ever seems to be out of desire to legitimize their own idea of womanhood, rather than coming from a place of attempted empathy.

i’m sure that seems a little cold, but i have no warmth for someone who sees a symbol of a woman’s agony and only focuses on how they could take it from her and fit it to their own life, regardless of how personal it was to her.

a symbol, i will state again, that was described as grotesque. this adjective was only revoked when the idea was applied to a transgender woman, as if this anonymous woman’s inherent female status made the original concept disgusting.

how could you see this obvious double standard and still think that our experiences are remotely equivalent? how could you not see the way that being female is such a crucial piece of this puzzle? how could you tell yourself that you could ever know what our lives are like?

our tears are not yours, our blood is not yours, our traumas and our heartaches and our struggles are not yours. no amount of wishful thinking or reframing things to resemble our experiences will ever make our lives yours.

the female experience is a distinctive one, and it shouldn’t be considered heresy to state this.

and it’s maddening to know that it’s such a shallow jealousy, an envy of our parts rather than our whole selves; wishing for our breasts and our wombs and our bodies while blithely ignorant to the realities we face because of them.

when i think of what womanhood looks like from the outside, i could see how one might want it, especially if you chop it up into bite-sized pieces with only the prettiest ones on display. if you never bother to look behind the curtain, it seems a lot nicer than it is.

but that’s not reality.

you covet our breasts, but don’t understand the pain that comes from having innocent body parts hyper-sexualized and banned from public spaces.

you covet our wombs, but don’t understand that we aren’t trusted to know what to do with them.

you covet our bodies, but don’t understand that we’re only ever seen as chattel and property because of them.

you covet our lives, but you don’t understand what we live through.

how’s that for grotesque?

Isn’t there at least one well known TiM online who got a uterus tattoo and tried to pretend it made him a wbw? He was super creepy if I remember. Skinny white dude.

Transgenderism is a movement made by whites who are bored and wanna feel oppressed

(via gendercritics)

May 22, 2018
Hey, this post may contain adult content, so we’ve hidden it from public view.
Learn more.

Hey, this post may contain adult content, so we’ve hidden it from public view.

Learn more.

May 22, 2018

radicalesbian:

no offense but the only people who claim to “feel like a woman” are males and Shania Twain

(via gendercritics)

May 1, 2018

fuckyeahkinkshaming-blog:

militant-tendency:

“Feminists fuck better.” Please stop. Men still hate you. “Watch me smash patriarchy while reverse cow-girlin’ you.” He still thinks you’re a bitch. “I only fuck feminists.” Thanks for letting me know nothing’s really changed. “Feminists can be sexy and cute!” I don’t care for mollifying feminism; you’re only trying to make it palpable for men. “Some porn stars are empowered by porn!” Individual empowerment doesn’t speak for macro-social repercussions of the very same industry; the majority of actresses in pornography go through shootings with the help of alcohol and drugs in order to numb the physical and mental abuse they suffer. Much of your individualistic understanding of empowerment and agency is very much complicit with patriarchal violence. So. 

fuck this is perfect and answers a lot of the people screaming in my ask box

(via helloema5)

May 1, 2018

artemiswasamerf:

How trans activists and trans people gonna talk about shooting TERFs and killing TERFs and doing shit where they walk in streets with bats at women’s marches and make literal hitlists towards radical feminist women then turn around and pretend like they are the “oppressed” group of people and that misgendering them would literally cause them to kill themselves.

Y'all make no sense.

May 1, 2018

lavender-hopes-dreams:

antiradfemboy:

Gynosexual =/= Lesbian

Gynosexual =/= Lesbian

Gynosexual =/= Lesbian

Gynosexual =/= Lesbian

Gynosexual =/= Lesbian

Gynosexual =/= Lesbian

  • Gynosexual =/= Lesbian
  1. Gynosexual =/= Lesbian


If you exclude trans women then you are gynosexual, not a lesbian. You see women only as vaginas. We are NOT saying you have to have sex with anyone, terfs. If you don’t date someone because they are black you are racist. If you don’t date someone because they are trans you are transphobic.

This is lesbophobic propaganda and further proof that terf is a slur and means lesbian.

(via lavender-hopes-dreams)

April 29, 2018

Anonymous asked: this is so funny

stone-hard-truth:

:

When did the LGBTQIAP+ community become funny

image

April 29, 2018

wildguess:

sad? go buy a basil plant. you will still be sad but you’ll be able to make pesto in a couple months

(via butchpower)

April 29, 2018

otsitsyataka:

eveningstarwoman:

eveningstarwoman:

just in case you don’t believe society never lets indigenous girls just be freakin girls: this reporter referred to a 12yo victim of racialized gang rape as “a Cree Jennifer Lopez”

ALSO today in colonial rape culture:

agencies in Montreal are handing Inuit women who fly into the city “welcome packets” which include information on how to avoid being a victim on human trafficking, but don’t arrest white men known to be sex traffickers who target Inuit women

😡

(via madradfem)

April 29, 2018

lesbeet:

if you’re able to recognize that if a woman is starving herself or cutting herself or otherwise harming herself, there are underlying issues that need to be figured out and addressed, both with the individual woman and with the societal pressures that force her to resort to such harmful behaviors, then you should be able to recognize that this same work needs to be done when considering women who enjoy being harmed during sex.

just because she is sexually gratified by it, and even if she actively, enthusiastically consents to it, does not mean that the behavior/experience is suddenly harmless, or that it’s inherently exempt from critique.

if a woman is consensually with someone who is sexually gratified by hurting/beating/degrading/abusing her, if she herself is being sexually gratified by being abused, we need to be asking why.

if you would worry about a woman who gets physical (but not sexual) pleasure from being stabbed, and purposely seeks out people who she can trust to stab her, then you need to worry about the woman who asks to be choked, whipped, electrocuted, and otherwise abused during sex.

(via vulvapeople)

April 29, 2018

w0manifest:

you can tell me “women are just as bad as men” when a multibillion dollar industry depicting the torture of men by women exists to cater to women’s demand to satisfy themselves sexually to such images, when women exploit male poverty to ensure themselves sexual access to men who would not otherwise desire them. 

(Source: northw0man, via gayasinnotqueer)

April 29, 2018
lesbianartandartists:
“Cyndra MacDowall, 1994
”

lesbianartandartists:

Cyndra MacDowall, 1994

(Source: lesbianartandartists, via whimsical-vanilla)

April 29, 2018
on “genital preference” and why the discourse is no replacement for individual conversations about consent, desire, and sexual behavior

hello-homophobes:

chainofclovers:

hello-homophobes:

chainofclovers:

The thing that might perplex me most about “genital preference” discourse is how it seems to erase the concept of actual, personal, individual conversations about consent and desire that have to occur at the relationship level any time two humans have sex with each other.

To provide a brief, probably inadequate recap of what I’ve been reading: some lesbians feel targeted and called out by members of the LGBTQ community (including other lesbians) for their homosexual desires, for wanting to have sex that doesn’t involve penises. These women claim they’re unfairly labeled as TERFs, transmisogynists, close-minded, etc. 

I’ve already blogged (my response is at the bottom of linked post) about how I’m a lesbian, a femme, and a queer, so that’s where I’m coming from. I’ll also mention that I’m in a monogamist relationship with a cis woman, and therefore am not in the dating scene or attempting to start a new sexual relationship of any kind. If circumstances were different and I was interested in a new relationship, I’d be open to dating cis women, trans women, and non-binary people, especially non-binary people whose lived experiences align with women’s experiences. I love women. I’m not interested in dating men. Took awhile to land there, but I’ve been there a long time, and it feels relatively simple.

I just find it completely mind-boggling that so much of this “I’m oppressed for having a genital preference” discourse seems to assume that within three seconds of starting to date a trans woman, there’d be a penis out and I’d be expected to interact with it immediately. Does every trans woman have a penis? Does every trans woman with a penis expect–or demand–that her penis be a central part of sexual intercourse, or else she’s calling the TERF police? Does every trans woman have the same sexual desires, the same expectations of her partner? Are people who are attracted to each other no longer able to talk and listen about what they want?

It’s just incredibly insulting. And it manages to elide something fundamental and crucial to every healthy sexual relationship: conversation. No matter the sexual identity, gender identity, and sexual orientation of the participants, you’re not ready to have sex unless you’re able to discuss topics like:

  • where each person wants to be touched
  • where each person wants to touch
  • each person’s interest or lack of interest in penetrating and/or being penetrated with body parts or toys
  • which positions each person is interested in trying
  • positions and behaviors that are off-limits for each person
  • each person’s preferences, boundaries, desires, and fears
  • sexual history and safer sex
  • what sex means, emotionally, for each person
  • things that may have changed since the last time each person had sex with each other or with other people
  • and SO MUCH MORE

Trans-exclusionary radical feminism wants you to believe that lesbians are under attack not for the many reasons we’re actually under attack, but because of some blanket mythological sexual desire that’s apparently incompatible with the queer community. That’s some transphobic bullshit, and it manages to conveniently forget about the essential conversational element of consensual sex. That conversation must include fundamental respect for an individual person’s preferences. Those preferences don’t look the same for everyone, and if it’s lesbian sex, it’s lesbian sex.

kweers hate homosexuals. 

homosexuality is not a preference. trans women do not meet the necessary condition of being biologically female. i am not bisexual like you op. i was born gay. i am genetically hardwired to only experience same sex attraction. we didn’t choose our orientation. you chose yours.

why would i date a trans woman? i’m not attracted to males. why would sex be the dealbreaker instead of every other thing about relationships? do all trans women have a penis? yes. bc surgery can’t make a real vagina and straight trans women almost never chop off their dicks. does every trans woman demand her penis be a part of sexual intercourse? who cares, the trans woman demands to be a part of sexual intercourse knowing lesbians are not attracted to the opposite sex. does every trans woman have the same desires and expectations? as a lesbian i don’t care about any male’s sexual desires or expectations bc none apply to me, someone who cannot experience attraction to the opposite sex. are people attracted to each other no longer able to talk and listen about what they want? this doesn’t apply to homosexual females, who are not attracted to the heterosexual trans women who want our attention.

none of this matters. you can write whatever you want about relationship navigation but it doesn’t apply. unlike you, we aren’t attracted to the opposite sex if we agree with their identity. unlike you i am not attracted to femininity. a male can’t dress or modify himself in any way that changes my sexual orientation. relationships and sexual boundaries are negotiable but orientation is not.

p.s. gay ppl are oppressed for having a genital preference. we call that homophobia: conversion therapy, corrective rape, sodomy laws, same sex marriage bans, gay adoption bans, state sponsored transition.

image
image

I wasn’t going to respond to this patently ridiculous rebuttal, but I do want to point out one thing: this person thinks I have the definition of homosexual wrong and that my perspective is abusive and damaging. In other words, this person thinks I have a disrespectful, harmful attitude towards a facet of our language, and would likely prefer that I use language more “carefully” and “accurately.” In response, they have:

  • Told me I’m bisexual even though I’m a lesbian
  • Called me “kweer” even though I prefer “queer”
  • Used the term “himself” to identify a trans woman’s behavior

There is absolutely no point in arguing orientations. But for anybody who read the reply above and feels shitty about it, just remember that the person making the argument against a trans-inclusive definition of lesbianism could not do it without disrespectfully and inaccurately defining the terms I use to describe myself. That hypocritical shit lacks power.

Finally: I’ve seen the affects of actual conversion therapy firsthand. Same-gender attraction? That’s not it. An inaccurate definition of conversion therapy hurts way, way worse than an internet person calling me kweer.

Big hugs to trans-inclusive and trans lesbians tonight! 

lesbianism is inclusive of trans ppl of the same sex

lesbianism is not male inclusive

you’re attracted to amabs and afabs. only bisexuals experience attraction to both sexes. homosexuals do not.

lesbians are same sex attracted biological females, not opposite sex attracted biological males. heterosexual and homosexual trans women even have different brains. 

> ut for anybody who read the reply above and feels shitty about it, just remember that the person making the argument against a trans-inclusive definition of lesbianism could not do it without disrespectfully and inaccurately defining the terms I use to describe myself. That hypocritical shit lacks power.

image
image

i know straight white males have power over homosexual females. i know opposite sex attraction has power over same sex attraction. you align with conversion therapists and corrective rapists. what power do you have over real lesbians? 

(via nevertheless-lesbians-persist)

April 29, 2018
Hey everyone

spiderman-against-pedos:

(Not so) Friendly reminder

Child porn is not a coping method
Child porn is not a coping method
Child porn is not a coping method
Child porn is not a coping method
Child porn is not a coping method
Child porn is not a coping method
Child porn is not a coping method
Child porn is not a coping method
Child porn is not a coping method
Child porn is not a coping method
Child porn is not a coping method
Child porn is not a coping method
Child porn is not a coping method
Child porn is not a coping method
Child porn is harmful to children
Child porn is harmful to children
Child porn is harmful to children
Child porn is harmful to children
Child porn is harmful to children
Child porn is harmful to children
Child porn is harmful to children
Child porn is harmful to children
Child porn is harmful to children
Child porn is harmful to children
Child porn is harmful to children
Child porn is harmful to children
Child porn is harmful to children
Child porn is illegal you sick fucks
Child porn is illegal you sick fucks
Child porn is illegal you sick fucks
Child porn is illegal you sick fucks
Child porn is illegal you sick fucks
Child porn is illegal you sick fucks
Child porn is illegal you sick fucks
Child porn is illegal you sick fucks
Child porn is illegal you sick fucks
Child porn is illegal you sick fucks
Child porn is illegal you sick fucks
Child porn is illegal you sick fucks
Child porn is illegal you sick fucks

Thank you

(Source: spiderman-anti, via violetdioxazine)